September 4, 2025 - The MEA Bargaining team members which included MEA chief negotiator Bruce Proud, Pat Barber, Valerie Finnegan, Helen King, Brian Kirchberg, Rob Lyons, Jon Syre, Evelyn Townsley and Dawn Walker met at the School Support Center for the fourth time on Tuesday, September 2, 2025, with management’s bargaining team members which included the District’s chief negotiator Mark West, Christina Britton, Silvana Ianinska, Derek Jensen, Joanna Keovilay, Gina Maliniak, Kevin Pendley, Sharon Scarbrough and Rachel Sellers.
Bruce began saying that he has concerns after being told during the last bargaining session that there was no more money. He said he had reviewed all the documents, looked at the district’s financial reports, looked at the Legislative reports as well as what is going on with other districts. He said his concerns are related to the significant reserves in the general fund as well as the money being carried forward from the Instructional function of the budget.
He said that in looking at the final budget in ’20-’21 the final budget went up $13-14 million, which is a considerable amount of money. Some was transferred from Special Funds. The actual expenditure was $8 million less and $30 million less in Instructional. Bruce showed that the reserves had grown to $120 million at the end of ’24-’25 and was projected to still have $60 million in the ’25-’26 budget. What happened? What caused the budget to grow?
Bruce went on to say that it wouldn’t be normal to talk about digging into reserves, but he has looked around the state at other budgets - this is not the norm. “I am pretty sure you wouldn’t be cutting staff with these reserves,” he said.
He said he knows the state requires districts to maintain 3% of their budgets in their reserves. The school board wants 5% according to their policy and wishes for 8%. The Board ended the last fiscal year with 21% and projected 9% for ’25-’26.
Budget Director Gina Maliniak and Deputy Superintendent Rachel Sellers explained that the district had high vacancies last year and average teacher positions cost $77,000 (with benefits). This year the teacher allocation was increased by 50, so $5.8 million would be needed from reserves.
The discussion continued regarding the increase in the fund balance with Gina providing information and Bruce asking further questions.
Bruce said that the numbers still don’t add up. This is what causes Legislators to be concerned and believe that districts have a lot of money.
Bruce also presented a document that showed how Manatee ranks in average teacher salary in comparison to comparable districts. He said it is unknown whether or not districts include the referendum when reporting their salaries to the Florida Department of Education (DOE); however, based on this report Manatee is last among the 11 comparable districts. Bruce said even small counties like Hardee and DeSoto recognize the importance of rewarding employees.
Mark West said if you have a proposal, we will look at it.
Bruce outlined the MEA proposal which included a new placement schedule for those newly hired teachers, salary increase of 6%, degree supplements increase of 6%, increase supplements by 6% and continue retention supplements at 16+ and 25+. For paras we are continuing our proposals for step plus $.70 and adding a retention supplement at 10+ years in the district.
Bruce added that for health insurance, we believe the district should pick up the full increase in premium which equates to the amount the district saved by not paying premium for those who did not participate.
The district raised concerns about rising costs. Employees also have concerns about their costs. The latest Consumer Price Index in the Tampa area is 3.3%.
After a caucus, Mark said there are significant differences in the proposals. He said that they are not going to be able to respond and will do their best to meet with the new leadership and the School Board between now and September 18, 2025.
The meeting was adjourned at 6:46 p.m.
Further details can be found by reading the minutes of each session which will be posted here on the MEA website once approved by both MEA and management.
The next bargaining session will be Thursday, September 18, 2025, at the SSC located at 215 Manatee Ave. W. starting at 5:30 p.m.
In solidarity,
The MEA Bargaining Team
###
August 22, 2025 - The MEA Bargaining team members which included MEA chief negotiator Bruce Proud, Pat Barber, Valerie Finnegan, Helen King, Brian Kirchberg, Rob Lyons, Jon Syre and Dawn Walker met for the third time Thursday, August 21st at the School Support Center with management’s bargaining team members which included the District’s chief negotiator Mark West, Christina Britton, Silvana Ianinska, Derek Jensen, Joanna Keovilay, Gina Maliniak, Cathy Milley, Kevin Pendley, Sharon Scarbrough and Rachel Sellers.
Christina Britton, Executive Director of Human Resources, presented the Health Insurance Committee’s recommendation for dealing with a 7.2% increase equaling $4.4 million in health insurance funding needed to keep the plan solvent for the 2026 plan year. She explained that the recommendation included changes to the benefits (deductibles, out of pocket limits, copays, etc.) that vary from plan to plan (Bronze, Silver and Gold) as well as a 5.5% increase to the Employee and Employer premiums. The premium increases range from $2 per paycheck for the single Bronze plan to $63 per paycheck for the Gold family plan. The full proposal for premium and plan changes is attached.
Bruce asked how much was saved by making the plan changes. Christina said $1 million was saved. Bruce reminded management that the savings to the plan from changes in the plan benefits shift the amount saved to out of pocket expenses for the employees – the people who use the plan.
Concerns were raised by Bruce about the declining number of employees participating in the health insurance plan. He pointed out that there are 1,000 employees not on the plan which saves the district $1 million in plan premiums. He asked what the district does with that money.
Christina said that it goes back into the fund. Bruce said that the plan documents do not show that that is what has happened, and the district is saving $1 million. What does the district do with that money?
Rachel Sellars said it goes in the plan and Bruce disputed that statement and asked for something that shows that it goes in the plan.
Mark West moved to addressing MEA’s initial salary proposal for teachers and paraprofessionals. Management’s team had reviewed MEA salary proposals and asked questions about how parts of the proposal would work. They asked about the Placement Schedule and provided their calculations of the parts of MEA’s teacher salary proposal and expressed concern that the proposal far exceeded the money they had available for bargaining.
In addition, Mark said the para proposal for 1 step would cost $331,145 and the proposal to raise each step by $.70 would cost $807,893 when benefits are included. He also added that these proposals were beyond the $540,000 the District team is authorized to offer.
Bruce said he would obviously like to see the data used for the calculations since it appears that some employees are included twice in the calculations.
Mr. West then distributed the District salary proposals including a Teacher hiring schedule that begins at $49,702 (current starting salary) and continues through level 9c with a 0.15% difference between each level. The District also proposed a salary increase of 2.5% for all eligible teachers on the Performance or Grandfathered salary schedules. Also included in the proposal was the cost for Retention supplements for Teachers newly eligible at 16+ years and 25+ years.
The District did not propose increases in the Performance schedule degree supplements, any new Retention supplements or increases in Differentiated/Supplemental schedule positions.
For Paras, the District proposed advancement of one step on the schedule for eligible paras and an increase of fifteen cents per hour ($0.15/hr).
Bruce asked questions about the district’s proposals for teachers including how they calculated information contained in their proposal such as the amount for performance pay ($50/$63), how many people it was based on, how they arrived at $5 million, etc.
He then moved on to the para proposal and explained that with step and an increase of $0.15/hr, five hundred (500) people would be taking home less pay than they were making previously. This proposal will not encourage employees to sign up for the plan or retain employees. He said he was trying to figure out the motivation for the proposal based on the health insurance and the pay.
Bruce raised the issue of how much money the district is willing to provide for raises. From what he could see the district is barely providing increases that are required under the state’s Teacher Salary Increase Allocation (TSIA) dollars earmarked for teachers, which is $3.7 million. Mark said that was all he had the authority to provide. Bruce challenged the district over only providing $3.7M for teachers when they have $61,000,000 in reserves. The district has carried over a large amount of money in reserves despite pressure from the state not to carry over money year after year.
The meeting adjourned 9:38 p.m.
The minutes of each session which will be posted once approved by both MEA and management.
The next bargaining sessions will be Tuesday, September 2, 2025, and Thursday, September 18, 2025 at the SSC located at 215 Manatee Ave. W. starting at 5:30 pm.
In solidarity,
The MEA Bargaining Team
Management money proposal 082125
Management Proposal Health Insurance Committee Recommendation 082125
###
August 14, 2025 - The MEA bargaining team members which included MEA chief negotiator Bruce Proud, Pat Barber, Valerie Finnegan, Helen King, Brian Kirchberg, Rob Lyons, Jon Syre, Evelyn Townsley and Dawn Walker met for the second time Wednesday, August 13, 2025 at the School Support Center with management’s bargaining team members which included the District’s chief negotiator Mark West, Christina Britton, Silvana Ianinska, Derek Jensen, Gina Maliniak, Cathy Milley, Sharon Scarbrough and Rachel Sellers.
MEA chief negotiator Bruce Proud presented a proposal for both teachers and paraprofessionals aimed at continuing to deal with compression and providing financial recognition for experience for all members of MEA bargaining units.
MEA’s initial proposal for teachers included
- a 6% pay increase for all eligible teachers (those who worked 99 days or more in ’24-’25),
- continuing the retention supplement at 16+ years ($2,100) and 25+ years ($3,600) of Manatee County schools teaching experience respectively,
- adding a new supplement for those with +10 years ($1,000) of Manatee County schools teaching experience and
- a proposal to add 6% to all supplements on the supplement schedule.
MEA initial para proposal included
- step movement for all eligible paras (those who worked 99 days or more in ’24-’25),
- a $.70 raise (COLA) added to each step,
- and the addition of a longevity supplement for those who have worked as a para in the Manatee County schools for 10+ years ($1,000) and 20+ years ($1,500).
The bargaining teams also had extensive discussions regarding the ’25-’26 Referendum Supplement for teachers and paraprofessionals. There was discussion of factors that had impacted the rollover amount that was credited to teachers and paras from ’24-’25 and available for inclusion in the supplements for ’25-’26. That amount was lower than it had been in the past due to:
- only collecting 94% of the expected tax collection,
- the 2% commission held back by the Manatee County Tax Collector, and
- the lowering of the appraised home values by $1 billion by the Property Appraiser.
MEA’s and Management’s bargaining teams discussed the impact of those factors on the money available for the teachers’ and paras’ referendum supplement and whether there would be a decrease in the supplement for ’25-’26 or whether the Board would add money above the previously agreed upon 51% for teachers and 5% for paraprofessionals in order to keep the supplement amounts the same for this year.
The Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) for the ’25-’26 Referendum Supplement shows that it was agreed that there would be no reduction in the supplements. In addition, the first payment for the referendum supplement will be on the August 22nd paycheck. The MOU shows all the information that went into calculating the teachers’ and paras’ supplements for both the ’24-’25 and the ’25-’26 work years.
The chief bargaining spokesman for management’s team, Mark West, closed by saying that MEA’s proposal went beyond what the Board had provided for negotiations. They would look at the proposals carefully and collect data to accurately cost everything out prior to the next bargaining session.
The meeting adjourned 9:30 pm.
The minutes of each session which will be posted once approved by both MEA and management.
The next bargaining session will be Thursday, August 21, 2025 at the SSC located at 215 Manatee Ave. W. starting at 5:30 pm.
In solidarity,
The MEA Bargaining Team
###
Tuesday, August 12, 2025 - The MEA bargaining team is scheduled to meet with the district bargaining team on Wednesday, August 13, 2025, and Thursday, August 21, 2025, beginning at 5:45 pm at the School Support Center, 215 Manatee Ave. W. in room 203.
All negotiations are open to the public, and anyone is welcome to come to observe.
In solidarity,
The MEA Bargaining Team
July 31, 2025 - The MEA Bargaining team members which included MEA chief negotiator Bruce Proud, Pat Barber, Valerie Finnegan, Helen King, Brian Kirchberg, Rob Lyons, Jon Syre and Dawn Walker met Wednesday, July 30th at the School Support Center with management’s bargaining team members which included the District’s chief negotiator Mark West, Christina Britton, Silvana Ianinska, Derek Jensen, Gina Maliniak, Joe Ranaldi, Sharon Scarbrough and Rachel Sellers.
The focus of this session was discussion of the School Board’s tentative budget (spending plan) for fiscal year ’25-’26. Rachel Sellers, Deputy Superintendent of Business Services, provided the teams with a brief overview of the Board’s tentative budget, which was adopted on Tuesday, July 29th. Rachel Sellers started by telling the bargaining teams that the Property Appraiser had lowered his assessment of property values by $1 billion from June to July. She also reported that beginning in November 2024, without notice, the Tax Collector began taking 2% commission out of the 1 mill referendum.
She then included information about the funding received from the Legislature, increased cost of FRS benefits passed on by the Legislature, the reserves maintained by the School Board, plans to move expenses from the referendum to the General Fund to accommodate the new programs added to the referendum, transfer of funds to Charter schools due to projected increased enrollment as well as projected increase in health insurance costs.
Bruce Proud followed up on Rachel Sellers presentation by reminding management that MEA has raised concerns in bargaining about the Board moving programs from the referendum to the General Fund for several years. The concern is continuing to shift programs back before you know what the General Fund is and putting pressure on the General Fund. The referendum is not stable, and if the Board moves the money to the General Fund, there will not be money for other things.
He then asked what the reserves were spent for since that fund went from $120 million at the close of the ’24-’25 fiscal year to $65 million in the tentative budget.
Rachel Sellers said part was transferred into training. Marc West pointed out that the need was generated by the Federal hold back of Title 2 funds which pay for teacher training.
She said a big part of the money moved from reserves was related to restricted programs and allocations.
There was also a brief discussion of what issues the parties would bring to the table and it was agreed that those would be restricted to Article XII (salaries and benefits) at this time.
Details can be found by reading the minutes of each session which will be posted on the MEA website once approved by both MEA and management.
Future dates for negotiations are coming soon.
In solidarity,
The MEA Bargaining Team
###
Monday, July 28, 2025 - The MEA bargaining team is scheduled to meet with the district bargaining team on July 30, 2025, at 4:00 pm at the School Support Center, 215 Manatee Ave. W. in room 203.
This will be the opening of contract negotiations for the teacher and para contracts for 2025-2026. This is a limited reopener negotiations; therefore, not all articles will be open for negotiations.
All negotiations are open to the public, and anyone is welcome to come to observe.
Below you will find a summary of the priorities captured from the responses from the Bargaining Surveys conducted in May.


Complete bargaining survey results:
The MEA bargaining team will post updates after each session including future bargaining dates.